<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lib Dem Liberalism @ ASI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onehourahead.com/blog/2008/05/21/lib-dem-liberalism-asi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onehourahead.com/blog/2008/05/21/lib-dem-liberalism-asi/</link>
	<description>Welcome</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jennie</title>
		<link>http://www.onehourahead.com/blog/2008/05/21/lib-dem-liberalism-asi/#comment-1844</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 10:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onehourahead.com/blog/2008/05/21/lib-dem-liberalism-asi/#comment-1844</guid>
		<description>Blargh. Because the centre ground of British politics isn't so far right as to be almost American now at all...

Clegg didn't say anything that people in favour of social justice could disagree with their. The trick is to ask him how he defines "better spent"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blargh. Because the centre ground of British politics isn&#8217;t so far right as to be almost American now at all&#8230;</p>
<p>Clegg didn&#8217;t say anything that people in favour of social justice could disagree with their. The trick is to ask him how he defines &#8220;better spent&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatGB</title>
		<link>http://www.onehourahead.com/blog/2008/05/21/lib-dem-liberalism-asi/#comment-1748</link>
		<dc:creator>MatGB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 16:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onehourahead.com/blog/2008/05/21/lib-dem-liberalism-asi/#comment-1748</guid>
		<description>"&lt;i&gt;The Lib Dems know that most of their key election battles in 2010 are going to be against the Conservatives&lt;/i&gt;"

I commented there as well on this—it's the opposite that's the case, defending against Tories, sure, but the real gains will be against Labour, where they'll need to pick up both dissafected Labourites and tactical Tories, and squeezing Tory votes will be just as important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>The Lib Dems know that most of their key election battles in 2010 are going to be against the Conservatives</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>I commented there as well on this—it&#8217;s the opposite that&#8217;s the case, defending against Tories, sure, but the real gains will be against Labour, where they&#8217;ll need to pick up both dissafected Labourites and tactical Tories, and squeezing Tory votes will be just as important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
